United States DC Circuit

A collective bargaining agreement was ambiguous as to scope, and upon an examination of parol evidence, the NLRB erred in concluding that the agreement covered multiple job sites, in its finding that an employer was obliged to furnish information sought by a union.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/14/2002
• Decided 12/13/2002
• Published 12/13/2002

Judges

• Before:  GINSBURG, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States DC Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Matthew Lee Wiener argued the cause for petitioner.   With him on the briefs was Jerome A. Hoffman.


• For Appellees:
  
• Joan E. Hoyte, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent.   With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney.  Charles P. Donnelly, Supervisory Attorney, entered an appearance., Richard B. Sigmond was on the brief for intervenor in support of respondent.