United States Ninth Circuit

A prior opinion, holding that parents of school children did not possess, under the Substantive Due Process Clause or the right to privacy, a constitutional right to limit the information that public schools make available to students, is reaffirmed with amendments to specific language in the opinion.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/02/2005
• Decided 05/17/2006
• Published 05/17/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM., Before DONALD P. LAY,REINHARDT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Matthew D. Staver, Erik W. Stanley, Anita L. Staver, Rena M. Lindevaldsen, and Mary E. McAlister, Liberty Counsel, Longwood, FL, for the plaintiffs-appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Dennis J. Walsh, Esq., Douglas Lyon, Esq., Law Offices of Dennis J. Walsh, APC, Encino, CA, for the defendants-appellees.