Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Panah v. Chappell, 13-99010

Affirmed. Even assuming there was no reasonable basis for the state court to deny the claim as to the first two requirements under Napue v. Illinois, the panel could not say that it would be unreasonable to conclude that the testimony did not satisfy the materiality requirement.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2019/08/21


  • Owens


  • United States Ninth Circuit


Copied to clipboard