United States Ninth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

NAGR v. Managan, 18-35010

Affirmed in part, reversed in part. The panel reasoned that requiring disclosure of information related to subtle and indirect communications likely to influence voters’ votes was critical to the State’s interest in promoting transparency and discouraging circumvention of its electioneering laws.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2019/08/12

Judges

  • Berzon

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel