United States Ninth Circuit

Affirming a district court order declining to evaluate the plaintiff's competency in a prisoner civil rights action and declining to award a guardian ad litem because they had no interest in the case that could have been protected by the appointment of a guardian ad litem, that the plaintiff had already incurred at least three strikes from prior cases and was subject to limitations, but declining to impose a strike for the dismissal of this lawsuit since it was not meritless.

Appellate Information

• Published 2017/07/18

Judges

• CLIFTON

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel