Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Gorman, 15-16600

In a civil forfeiture action, the district court's order granting claimant's motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a traffic stop and order granting attorney's fees are affirmed where: 1) the first stop of claimant's vehicle was unreasonably prolonged in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and 2) none of the exceptions to the 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine applied.

Appellate Information

  • Published 2017/06/12

Judges

  • REINHARDT

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard