United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Gorman, 15-16600
In a civil forfeiture action, the district court's order granting claimant's motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a traffic stop and order granting attorney's fees are affirmed where: 1) the first stop of claimant's vehicle was unreasonably prolonged in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and 2) none of the exceptions to the 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine applied.
Appellate Information
- Published 2017/06/12
Judges
- REINHARDT
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit