United States Ninth Circuit
Nat'l Inst. of Famil and Life Advocates v. Harris, 16-55249
In a motion for a preliminary injunction sought by three religiously-affiliated non-profit corporations to prevent the enforcement of the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act, the district court's denial of the motion is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's are not entitled to a preliminary injunction based on their free exercise claims; 2) the Act is a neutral lawof general applicability, which survived rational basis review; and 3) plaintiffs were unable to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of their First Amendment claims.
Appellate Information
- Published 2016/10/14
Judges
- NELSON
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit