Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


Lee v. ING Group, N.V., 14-15848

In an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the District Court's grant of summary judgment to defendants and award of statutory damages to plaintiff is: 1) affirmed in part where the District Court properly imposed a penalty under 29 U.S.C. section 1132(c)(1) on the ERISA plan administrator for failing to produce the Plan Document within 30 days of the plaintiff’s request; and 2) reversed in part where the district court's decision to impose a penalty based on the plan administrator's failure to timely produce emails under 29 C.F.R. section 1132(c)(1), applies only to documents that plan administrators are required to produce.

Appellate Information

  • Published 2016/07/25

Judges

  • FARRIS

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard