United States Ninth Circuit
Ebner v. Fresh, Inc., 13-56644
In a class action, alleging that Fresh, Inc. deceived consumers about the quantity of lip balm in its Sugar Lip Treatment product line, the district court's dismissal under F.R. Civ. Pro 12(b)(6) is affirmed where plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to state a violation of California law.
Appellate Information
- Decided
- Published 2016/03/17
Judges
- TASHIMA
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit