United States Ninth Circuit

In a grazing rights action, the district court's judgment for defendants is vacated and remanded where: 1) defendants' unauthorized grazing of cattle on federal lands was unlawful and the district court improperly relied on defendants' water rights to reach a contrary conclusion; 2) defendants' counter-claim under the Administrative Procedure Act is barred by the statute of limitations; and 3) the case is remanded with instructions for reassignment to a different judge.

Appellate Information

• Published 2016/01/15

Judges

• GRABER

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel