United States Ninth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Oyama v. Univ. of Hawaii, 13-16524

In a case alleging free speech and due process violations in the denial of plaintiff's application to become a student teacher, the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendant-university is affirmed where the university's decision directly related to defined and established professional standards, was narrowly tailored to serve the university's core mission, reflected reasonable professional judgment, and followed adequate procedural protections.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2015/12/29

Judges

  • WARDLAW

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title


      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More