United States Ninth Circuit
Mays v. Clark, 12-17189
In a habeas corpus action challenging petitioner's conviction for first-degree murder, the district court's denial of the petition is affirmed where: 1) the California Court of Appeal's determination that no Miranda violation occurred when police continued to interrogate defendant after he requested a lawyer was an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law; but 2) the California Court of Appeal's determination that the error was harmless was not objectively unreasonable.
Appellate Information
- Published 2015/12/08
Judges
- CHRISTEN
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit