Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


Glick v. Edwards, 13-35230

In an action alleging a vast governmental conspiracy to violate plaintiff's civil rights following his conviction for sexually assaulting a minor, the district judge's and magistrate judge's refusal to recuse themselves is affirmed where the rule of necessity permitted them to hear the case despite plaintiff naming them and the Federal District Court of Montana as defendants.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/07/2015
  • Published 10/07/2015

Judges

  • BEA

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard