United States Ninth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

O'Bannon, Jr. v. NCAA, 14-16601

In an action challenging NCAA rules prohibiting student-athletes from being paid for the use of their names, images, and likenesses, the district court's judgment for plaintiffs is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the NCAA's rules are not exempt from the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1, and are subject to the Rule of Reason; and 2) the district court's permanent injunction ordering the NCAA to allow members schools to pay students up to $5,000 a year in deferred compensation was erroneous.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/30/2015
  • Published 09/30/2015

Judges

  • BYBEE

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel