United States Ninth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Picot v. Weston, 12-17098

In this diversity action alleging various tort and contract claims, the district court's dismissal of the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction is affirmed, where: 1) plaintiff is a resident of California and defendant is a resident of Michigan; 2) defendant neither purposefully availed himself of the privilege of conducting activities in California nor expressly aimed his conduct at California; and 3) therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing for lack of specific personal jurisdiction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/19/2015
  • Published 03/19/2015

Judges

  • Tashima

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel