United States Ninth Circuit

Denial of motion to suppress evidence obtained through a search of defendant's residence is affirmed, where: 1) under Georgia v. Randolph, a resident who is refusing consent must be present at the house and expressly refuse to allow the search; and 2) the search was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment, as defendant refused to come to the door and acquiesced in letting his fiancé deal with the police.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/23/2014
• Published 10/23/2014

Judges

• Silverman

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel