United States Ninth Circuit

In this diversity action, plaintiff alleges that, due to defendant's failure to warn users of its networking website, she was a victim of a rape scheme. Dismissal is reversed and remanded for further proceedings, where plaintiff's negligent failure to warn claim did not seek to hold defendant liable as the "publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider," and therefore the Communications Decency Act did not bar the claim.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/17/2014
• Published 09/17/2014

Judges

• Clifton

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel