United States Ninth Circuit

Defendant's post-revocation sentence, imposed consecutively to defendant's criminal sentence for illegal reentry, is affirmed, where: 1) a district court can continue post-revocation sentencing for a reasonable time to consider a supervised releasee's sentence in the underlying criminal proceeding as part of evaluating the supervised releasee's breach of trust; 2) the approximately three week continuance of defendant's revocation hearing was not unreasonable under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1; and 3) the twelve-month post-revocation sentence is not substantively unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/30/2014
• Published 07/30/2014

Judges

• GOULD

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel