Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Daniels, 13-50331

Defendant's sentence, imposed after revocation of supervised release, is vacated and remanded for resentencing, where: 1) Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a court to address a supervised releasee personally to ask if he wants to speak before the court imposes a post-revocation sentence, and 2) a district court that does not offer a supervised releasee the chance to exercise that right commits plain error.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/23/2014
  • Published 07/23/2014

Judges

  • GOULD

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard