United States Ninth Circuit
Frost v. Van Boening, 11-35114
The district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition challenging the trial court's decision to preclude defense counsel from making a reasonable doubt argument to the jury is reversed and remanded, where: 1) the trial court infringed petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by precluding counsel from making a reasonable doubt argument to the jury, 2) petitioner was deprived of his right to demand that the jury find him guilty of all the elements of the crime; 3) the burden of proof was unconstitutionally shifted; 4) petitioner's right to present a closing argument was violated; and 5) these errors were structural and not subject to harmless error review.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/29/2014
- Published 04/29/2014
Judges
- THOMAS
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit