United States Ninth Circuit

Petition for review of the BIA's denial of asylum and withholding of removal to a citizen of China who asserted claims based on his resistance to China's family planning policies, is denied where a reasonable factfinder would not be compelled to conclude that petitioner resisted China’s one-child family planning policy where he married when underage, had children earlier than China’s policy allowed, and grudgingly complied with fines.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/17/2014
• Published 04/17/2014

Judges

• Clifton

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel