United States Ninth Circuit

The district court properly denied a habeas corpus petition challenging a parole term and sex-offender registration requirement imposed under California state law that were not part of the criminal judgment, where: 1) the parole challenge was moot because petitioner is no longer on parole; and 2) the sex-offender registration was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/25/2013
• Published 09/25/2013

Judges

• NGUYEN

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel