United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Earl, 12-10169
The district court's order revoking supervised release and imposing additional conditions on the defendant is affirmed, where the trial court retained jurisdiction to revoke defendant's term of supervised release because a prisoner's term of supervised release does not begin when he is on home confinement while still serving his federal sentence, because he remains in Bureau of Prisons' legal custody during that time.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/05/2013
- Published 09/05/2013
Judges
- CARR
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit