Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Earl, 12-10169

The district court's order revoking supervised release and imposing additional conditions on the defendant is affirmed, where the trial court retained jurisdiction to revoke defendant's term of supervised release because a prisoner's term of supervised release does not begin when he is on home confinement while still serving his federal sentence, because he remains in Bureau of Prisons' legal custody during that time.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/05/2013
  • Published 09/05/2013

Judges

  • CARR

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard