United States Ninth Circuit

Judgment revoking defendant's supervised release is affirmed, where: 1) Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 (1954), which requires a conviction to rest on more than the uncorroborated confession of the defendant, does not apply to revocation of supervised release; and 2) here, the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant's supervised release based on his confession.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/26/2013
• Published 08/26/2013

Judges

• McKEOWN

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel