United States Ninth Circuit

An Indian citizen's petition for review, of an IJ's denial of all of the claims for relief in finding that petitioner had filed a frivolous asylum application for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit in violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1158(d)(6), and was therefore permanently ineligible for relief under the INA, is denied, as a matter of law, the written advisals on the I-589 asylum application form provide applicants with adequate notice of the consequences of filing a frivolous asylum application and of the privilege of being represented by counsel, as required by section 1158(d)(4)(A).

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/06/2012
• Published 09/06/2012

Judges

• Nguyen

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel