United States Ninth Circuit

On remand from the United States Supreme Court in light of its decision in U.S. v. Jones, district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence derived from using a mobile tracking devices placed under his vehicle is affirmed, as the agents objectively relied on then-existing binding precedent when they approached defendant's vehicle in public areas, attached tracking devices to it, and used those devices to monitor the vehicle's movements.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/06/2012
• Published 08/06/2012

Judges

• O'Scannlain

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel