United States Ninth Circuit

In an appeal by defendant convicted and sentence for bank embezzlement in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 656, the district court's revocation of defendant's second term of supervised release, which had not yet commenced, based on newly discovered violations of conditions of her previously revoked first term of supervised release, is reversed where a district court lacks jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. section 3583(e)(3) to revoke a term of supervised release based on newly discovered violations of a previously revoked term of supervised release.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/21/2012
• Published 06/21/2012

Judges

• MOSKOWITZ

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel