United States Ninth Circuit

In an appeal of a Rule 60(a) motion to correct an existing judgment so that it could be enforced in France, the district court's grant of motion to correct judgments is affirmed where: 1) the amendments only clarified the original intent of the judgments, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in making those changes under Rule 60(a); 2) by failing to challenge the original judgments, defendant waived his arguments as to setoff, release, and the nature and amount of his liability; and 3) the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to stay entry of the amended or corrected judgments.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/19/2012
• Published 06/19/2012

Judges

• GRABER

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel