United States Ninth Circuit

On a petition for habeas corpus that included three claims challenging a state administrative agency’s order that she return to superior court for resentencing, the district court's dismissal of those claims as untimely is affirmed, where: 1) the one-year statute of limitations in 28 USC section 2244(d)(1) is applied on a claim-by-claim basis so that each claim must survive the time bar; 2) the limitations period for the administrative action the petitioner challenged in the three claims expired nearly 18 months before the petition was filed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/21/2012
• Published 02/21/2012

Judges

• Ikuta

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Anand Krishnaswamy, Anthony Da Silva