United States Ninth Circuit

In an appeal from a judgment of the district court denying petitioner habeas relief from his enhanced conviction for first-degree murder, judgment is affirmed where the state court did not act contrary to clearly established federal law as when, in light of the context and circumstances, it held that the supplemental jury charge given at petitioner’s trial was not coercive.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/27/2011
• Published 12/27/2011

Judges

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel