United States Ninth Circuit
Carrico v. City and County of San Francisco, 09-17151
In an appeal from a judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiffs' facial First Amendment and vagueness challenges to portions of an amendment to defendant's rent-stabilization ordinance, “Proposition M,” judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs lack standing.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/06/2011
- Published 09/06/2011
Judges
- BLOCK
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Paul F. Utrecht, Tara M. Steeley