United States Ninth Circuit
Harlick v. Blue Shield of California, 10-15595
In an appeal from a judgment of the district court granting summary adjudication in favor of defendant in an action for coverage under an ERISA plan, judgment is reversed where although plaintiff's insurance plan does not require defendant to pay for the care plaintiff received at a residential treatment facility for her anorexia, the California Mental Health Parity Act does.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/26/2011
- Published 08/26/2011
Judges
- W. FLETCHER,
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit