United States Ninth Circuit

In a petition for habeas relief from convictions of first degree murder, robbery, and burglary, 28 U.S.C. section 2254, on the grounds of Miranda violations, judgment of the district court denying petition is affirmed where, under AEDPA deference, it cannot conclude that the decisions of the California state courts on very close Miranda questions, were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, established Supreme Court precendent.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/03/2011
• Published 06/03/2011

Judges

• TALLMAN

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel