United States Ninth Circuit
Harmston v. City and Cty. of San Francisco, 09-16562
In plaintiff's appeal from the district court's order sanctioning plaintiff and his attorney for violating the court's discovery protective order, the appeal is dismissed where, because the district court's remand order constituted a final order, plaintiff's last day to appeal came 180 days later, on April 17, 2009, and thus the appeal was untimely.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/10/2010
- Published 12/13/2010
Judges
- Jay S. Bybee
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Waukeen Q. McCoy, Lawrence Hecimovich