Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


California Pharm. Ass'n v. Maxwell-Jolly, 09-55532

In an action to enjoin the California Department of Health Care Services Director from implementing state legislation reducing payments to certain medical service providers, a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed where the state failed to study the impact of a 5% percent rate reduction on the statutory factors of efficiency, economy, quality, and access to care prior to implementing the rate reductions.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/19/2010
  • Decided 03/03/2010
  • Published 03/03/2010

Judges

  • Before STEPHEN REINHARDT, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of California, Jennifer M. Kim, Shannon M. Chambers and Randall R. Murphy, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General, and Gregory M. Cribbs, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant David Maxwell-Jolly., Lloyd A. Bookman, Byron J. Gross, and Jordan B. Keville, Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees California Pharmacists Association, et al.
Copied to clipboard