United States Ninth Circuit

In an appeal from the district court's denial of appellant's motion to intervene as of right in a securities fraud action, the order is affirmed where appellant was improperly attempting to enforce a restitution order in a parallel criminal action in a manner outside the scope of 18 U.S.C. section 3664(m)(1)(B).

Appellate Information

• Argued 12/11/2009
• Decided 02/09/2010
• Published 02/09/2010

Judges

• Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Richard M. Goldstein, Goldstein, Tanen & Trench, P.A., Miami, FL, for proposed-intervenor-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Evan Jason Smith, Esquire, Brodsky & smith, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee., Deborah F. Sanders, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Columbus, OH, for the creditor-appellee.