United States Ninth Circuit
Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, 08-35966
In an action claiming that plaintiff was entitled to part of an amount refunded by the Federal Trade Commission following a judgment against plaintiff and defendants, dismissal of the action as untimely is affirmed where defendant's actions in raising the reserve requirement of entities partially controlled by defendant gave rise to plaintiff's claims in 2000, and therefore the statute of limitations began to run at that time.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/14/2009
- Decided 01/29/2010
- Published 01/29/2010
Judges
- Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY,Senior Circuit Judge, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Ernst Leonard, Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, and Jeremy Robert Larson, Foster Pepper & Shefelman, Seattle, WA, for the appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Derek A. Newman and Derek Linke, Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, Seattle, WA, for the appellees.