United States Ninth Circuit
Dupree v. Holman Prof'l. Counseling Ctrs., 07-55617
In an ERISA action for health benefits, judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff's stay at a residential treatment center that had no contract with defendant-insurer was not covered under plaintiff's health plan.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/22/2008
- Decided 07/29/2009
- Published 07/29/2009
Judges
- Before: HARRY PREGERSON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Lisa S. Kantor, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Robert C. Bohner, David M. Humiston and Douglas J. Collodel, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, and Michael A. Vanic, Reish Luftman Reicher & Cohen, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees.