United States Ninth Circuit

In an action by county attorneys challenging certain post-sentencing probation programs adopted and supervised by the superior court, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the programs because their alleged injury was insufficiently concrete.

Appellate Information

• Argued 10/23/2008
• Decided 07/15/2009
• Published 07/15/2009

Judges

• WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:, Before:  J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and SUSAN P. GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael A. Carvin, Jones Day, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiffs-appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Scot L. Claus, Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre & Friedlander, P.A., Phoenix, AZ, for the defendants-appellees.