United States Ninth Circuit

Defendant's conviction for malicious interference with a military radio system is affirmed, where Defendant waived his right to counsel knowingly and intelligently, because the prosecutor did not err in including the potential sentencing enhancements in his calculation of the maximum possible penalty provided by law.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/13/2009
• Decided 07/10/2009
• Published 07/10/2009

Judges

• IKUTA, Circuit Judge:, Before:  STEPHEN S. TROTT, ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee., Elizabeth A. Newman, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant.