United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Ringgold, 06-10492
Defendant's firearm possession sentence is affirmed, where a District Court does not abuse its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court.
Appellate Information
- Argued 12/15/2008
- Decided 07/07/2009
- Published 07/07/2009
Judges
- THOMAS, Circuit Judge:, Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, EDWARD LEAVY and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Jerome E. Matthews (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oakland, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, Barbara J. Valliere, Assistant United States Attorney, and W.S. Wilson Leung (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.