Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Ringgold, 06-10492

Defendant's firearm possession sentence is affirmed, where a District Court does not abuse its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 12/15/2008
  • Decided 07/07/2009
  • Published 07/07/2009

Judges

  • THOMAS, Circuit Judge:, Before:  J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, EDWARD LEAVY and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Jerome E. Matthews (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oakland, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, Barbara J. Valliere, Assistant United States Attorney, and W.S. Wilson Leung (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard