Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Espinosa, 08-50092

Defendant's sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. is vacated where the district court erred in assessing a criminal history point based on Defendant's 2004 state loitering conviction, because Section 4A1.2(c)(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that loitering is not a basis for enhancement.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/24/2009
  • Published 06/24/2009

Judges

  • PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:, Before: HARRY PREGERSON and DOROTHY W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMES K. SINGLETON, Senior District Judge.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Brock H. Lunsford, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Domestic Security and Immigration Crimes Section, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellee.
Copied to clipboard