United States Ninth Circuit
Buckingham v. Gannon, 08-35059
In an appeal from the District Court's order disapproving a settlement of an ERISA class action, the appeal is dismissed, where the order disapproving the settlement did not have "serious, perhaps irreparable, consequences," and thus was not appealable.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/17/2008
- Decided 04/22/2009
- Published 04/22/2009
Judges
- PER CURIAM:, Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, B. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Steve Berman and Andrew M. Volk, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, WA; Douglas A. Buxbaum and John M. Fitzpatrick, Buxbaum Daue & Fitzpatrick, Andrew D. Huppert, Missoula, MT; Thomas M. Peterson, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, San Francisco, CA; and J. Gerard Stranch, IV, James G. Stranch, III and Jane B. Stranch, Branstetter Stranch & Jennings PLLC, Nashville, TN, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- J. David Jackson and Frederick Matthew Ralph, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, Minneapolis, MN; Nicole A. Diller and Lisa S. Serebin, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, San Francisco, CA; Patrick T. Fleming, Fleming & O'Leary, Butte, MT, for the defendants-appellants., John A. Litwinski and Nancy G. Ross, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, Chicago, IL; and Chris C. Scheithauer, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, Irvine, CA, for the defendant-appellee.