Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Kincaid-Chauncey, 06-10544

Defendant's conviction for wire fraud and extortion is affirmed, where the testimony of certain witnesses proposed by Defendant would be inadmissible because it constituted impeachment of cross-examination testimony by contradiction.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/27/2008
  • Decided 02/20/2009
  • Published 02/20/2009

Judges

  • Before:  ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for appellant Mary Kincaid-Chauncey.

  • For Appellees:
  • Daniel R. Schiess, Assistant United States Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for appellee United States.
Copied to clipboard