United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Kincaid-Chauncey, 06-10544
Defendant's conviction for wire fraud and extortion is affirmed, where the testimony of certain witnesses proposed by Defendant would be inadmissible because it constituted impeachment of cross-examination testimony by contradiction.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/27/2008
- Decided 02/20/2009
- Published 02/20/2009
Judges
- Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for appellant Mary Kincaid-Chauncey.
- For Appellees:
- Daniel R. Schiess, Assistant United States Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for appellee United States.