United States Ninth Circuit

Defendant's conviction is affirmed, as a document showing that Defendant did not receive wages during the relevant time period was nontestimonial, and thus its admission did not violate the Confrontation Clause.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/18/2009
• Published 02/18/2009

Judges

• Before THOMAS M. REAVLEY,RICHARD C. TALLMAN, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Robert J. Pfister and Andrew B. Brettler, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant., James A. McDevitt and K. Jill Bolton, United States Attorney, Spokane, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee.