United States Ninth Circuit
Rohr v. Salt River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist., 06-16527
In a lawsuit against former employer brought by an insulin-dependent type 2 diabetic for employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), summary judgment for defendant is vacated where, even under pre-ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) law, the district court erred in concluding that plaintiff was neither "disabled" nor a "qualified individual" under the ADA.
Appellate Information
- Argued 07/15/2008
- Decided 02/13/2009
- Published 02/13/2009
Judges
- BAER, Senior District Judge:, Before: RICHARD A. PAEZ and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges, and HAROLD BAER, JR., Senior District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Linda D. Skon, Law Office of Linda D. Skon, Mesa, AZ, for plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John J. Egbert, Esq., Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee.