Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


Lakeside-Scott v. Multnomah County, 05-35896

In a suit alleging retaliatory discharge after plaintiff complained about co-workers and one of her supervisors, denial of defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law is reversed where a final decision maker's wholly independent, legitimate decision to terminate an employee may insulate from liability a lower-level supervisor involved in the process who had a retaliatory motive to have the defendant fired.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/09/2007
  • Decided 02/12/2009
  • Published 02/12/2009

Judges

  • Before:  RAYMOND C. FISHER and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges and JUDITH M. BARZILAY, Judge.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • George P. Fisher, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee., Jenny M. Morf (argued), Assistant County Attorney;  Katie A. Lane, Assistant County Attorney, Portland, OR, for the defendant-appellant.
Copied to clipboard