United States Ninth Circuit

The opinion previously filed by the panel is withdrawn and replaced by the current opinion. Conviction for conflict of interest, wire fraud, and making a false statement is affirmed where, given the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of all three crimes beyond a reasonable doubt.

Appellate Information

• Argued 05/06/2008
• Decided 02/09/2009
• Published 02/09/2009

Judges

• Before:  RICHARD C. TALLMAN and RICHARD R. CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD R. KORMAN, District Judge.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Per Olson, Hoevet, Boise & Olson, P.C., Portland, OR, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, and Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR, for appellee.