United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Williams, 06-50599, 06-50608, 06-50612
Defendants' convictions for conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by robbery, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, and possession of a firearm during a drug crime and crime of violence are reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions; 2) the government did not deny the defendants their due process rights by engaging in outrageous conduct; but 3) the district court, although it did not intend to do so, gave an Allen charge after a juror disclosed that she was a holdout.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/08/2008
- Decided 11/06/2008
- Published 11/06/2008
Judges
- BYBEE, Circuit Judge:, Before: WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR., ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Benjamin L. Coleman, Coleman & Balogh LLP, San Diego, CA, for appellant David Williams., Michael Edmund Burke, San Diego, CA, for appellant William Steel., Brian J. White, San Diego, CA, for appellant Talford Brown.
- For Appellees:
- Stephen Frederick Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, CA, for appellee United States.