United States Ninth Circuit
Potter v. Hughes, 06-56082
In a shareholder derivative action, dismissal for failure to make adequate demand on the board of directors is affirmed where demand letters regarding the disputed transactions were sent by a fellow shareholder and did not include plaintiff's name.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/04/2008
- Decided 10/10/2008
- Published 10/10/2008
Judges
- Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, RONALD M. GOULD, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Edward M. Gergosian and Robert J. Gralewski, Gergosian & Gralewski, LLP, San Diego, CA, for the appellants.
- For Appellees:
- David Dinielli and Shoshana Bannett, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for appellees B. Wayne Hughes, Jr., and Tamara Hughes Gustavson., Richard B. Specter, Corbett, Steelman & Specter, Irvine, CA, for appellees Dann V. Angeloff, Thomas J. Barrack, Jr., Robert J. Abernethy, William C. Baker, Uri P. Harkham, Daniel C. Staton, and John T. Evans., John M. Potter and Scott G. Lawson, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Hedges LLP, San Francisco, CA, for appellees Marvin M. Lotz, Harvey Lenkin, Ronald L. Havner, Jr., John Reyes, David Goldberg, A. Timothy Scott, and Public Storage, Inc.